Comments on: Perl as good as java, python and PHP way above http://perl.baczynski.com/future/perl-good-as-java Perl, CPAN, YAPC... et ceatera Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:50:41 +0000 hourly 1 By: admin http://perl.baczynski.com/future/perl-good-as-java/comment-page-1#comment-283 admin Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:51:11 +0000 http://perl.baczynski.com/?p=242#comment-283 Adam: here you are - http://perl.baczynski.com/future/perl-php-corporate Adam: here you are – http://perl.baczynski.com/future/perl-php-corporate

]]> By: Perl, PHP, corporate – continued. « Perl http://perl.baczynski.com/future/perl-good-as-java/comment-page-1#comment-276 Perl, PHP, corporate – continued. « Perl Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:16:34 +0000 http://perl.baczynski.com/?p=242#comment-276 [...] to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Remember when I wrote about Perl, Python and PHP taking bigger part in corporate world? Here is nice analysis that shows that PHP growth in this one particular job ads [...] [...] to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Remember when I wrote about Perl, Python and PHP taking bigger part in corporate world? Here is nice analysis that shows that PHP growth in this one particular job ads [...]

]]> By: mj41 http://perl.baczynski.com/future/perl-good-as-java/comment-page-1#comment-271 mj41 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:13:21 +0000 http://perl.baczynski.com/?p=242#comment-271 btw, no so popular here http://csclub.uwaterloo.ca/contest/language_profile.php?lang=Perl btw, no so popular here http://csclub.uwaterloo.ca/contest/language_profile.php?lang=Perl

]]> By: admin http://perl.baczynski.com/future/perl-good-as-java/comment-page-1#comment-270 admin Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:58:43 +0000 http://perl.baczynski.com/?p=242#comment-270 You are right. I will address this isuue in one of next posts. You are right. I will address this isuue in one of next posts.

]]> By: Adam Kennedy http://perl.baczynski.com/future/perl-good-as-java/comment-page-1#comment-267 Adam Kennedy Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:55:57 +0000 http://perl.baczynski.com/?p=242#comment-267 You've fallen into the obvious trap in that article. That graph shows the RELATIVE growth rate of each language, relative to itself. It does NOT show numbers you can compare BETWEEN languages. You’ve fallen into the obvious trap in that article.

That graph shows the RELATIVE growth rate of each language, relative to itself.

It does NOT show numbers you can compare BETWEEN languages.

]]>